Broken Corset

December 5, 2010

Isn’t There Anyone Who Knows What Christmas is All About?

My title is one of my favorite quotes, from one of my favorite Christmas specials.  Good ol’ Charlie Brown – and his dilapidated tree – “all it needed was a little love” Linus tells us…  and with that line, he seems to answer the question – what is Christmas all about? Love.  Christmas is about love.  For unto us a child was born – and he came to save the world – a sign of God’s love for us.  It might possibly be one of the most beautiful stories told.

I can easily swing from the Charlie Brown story into the Christmas Song by Dave Matthews… It tells the story of Jesus in a beautifully sad tone, reminding us of the people Jesus spent time with – people who were “less than golden hearted” – and of how the world in his presence and afterward was filled with love…  “love, love is all around”.

It probably wouldn’t be fair to call myself a Christian.  But at Christmastime, I can easily become captivated by the beauty of the tale and the message of love.  And I always love the music of the season… my favorites are the more haunting pieces like What Child is This? (Greensleeves melody).

And within the Christmas story, I can’t help but think of Mary.  How scary it would be to have an angel visit you, to bear the child of God…. to travel great distances, and give birth in a manger.  Amy Grant’s Breath of Heaven gets at it… And I think of how motherhood has changed my life, and yet Mary is barely discussed.  But Mary is close to my heart this season, as is the gift of motherhood- because while she’s not at the center of Christianity, for a bit at Christmas, she’s got a starring role.  And if you are a mom, you know that being a mom is a starring role – even if it’s also often unappreciated.

Now, I want to tell you a story about another mom, and it’s a scary story too…  and if you bear with me, I’ll eventually get to how it’s all related.

Lisa Howe is about to become a mother.  A successful soccer coach at Belmont University in Tennessee, she will add motherhood to her resume beginning in May.  As ANY mom knows…  it will change her life.  If everything goes well, she will be exhausted, emotionally strung out, and probably sick a lot more for a few years.  She will also come to work with spit up or crumbs in her hair and clothes, and probably feel a need now and then to tell a few annoying stories about the baby’s first word or first steps.  Annoying of course, only to the jaded of the world… miraculous and amazing to Lisa… and wonderfully sweet to those who care about her.

Anyway, no surprise… she decided to tell her soccer team about the great expectation – I mean, you seriously can’t hide being a mom… even if you could somehow hide the pregnancy.

And that is where she ran into problems. Because as it turns out, Lisa is not carrying this sweet little being… her partner is.  And because of that fact, Lisa was fired.  Okay, so Belmont says she wasn’t fired, nor did she resign….  but apparently it was communicated that she would be fired, so she chose instead to leave.

Belmont is a Catholic University… and if you don’t know where the Catholics stand on gay marriage… well, you haven’t been paying attention.  And so Lisa, her life being out of step with Catholic values was no longer welcome.  According to a few articles, if she hadn’t left before the baby was born, she would have had to leave afterward, because, like I said… you just can’t hide a baby.

But this is where I am so lost.  I mean….  don’t the Catholics know what Christmas is all about??  Am I am so uninformed that I am confused???  Because my understanding of things was that Jesus was born to all of us, that Jesus welcomed everyone , that he associated with people regardless of whether he agreed with them.  And I thought that when he died it was for everyone too.  Isn’t Christmas about love and acceptance?  I mean, I suppose the pope probably knows more than Charlie Brown and Dave Matthews…  but really?… it’s fucking super out of sync in my mind.  I’m trying to make a list of the values that Belmont University’s Catholic education must hold…  but given this story, I’m really at a loss.

Anyway…  ’tis the season I guess.

When I read a story like Lisa’s… I feel like Charlie Brown – is there no meaning to Christmas anymore?  But then I try and remember that each child is a gift to the world – and Lisa’s child too.  And every baby born changes the world in some fashion… And the more children born who are taught the values of acceptance and love, the more Charlie Brown’s spirit of Christmas will spread – and slowly, I truly believe, the hatred and fear will be smothered.

So I guess, when it comes to Christmas… I’m all about the message of Charlie Brown and Dave Matthews – and I’m not sure they aren’t a bit ahead of the Catholic Church here, even if they are commercial creations…

Merry Christmas Lisa….  all of my best wishes and love on the coming birth of your child… I know love.  And, though it might not seem that way now, when that baby is born, you will realize it is all around.

September 16, 2010

I Want a Fast Car

Filed under: California, Civil Rights, exercise, gay marriage, Marriage, music, Sexuality — saracallow @ 8:25 pm

I’ve had several people ask me why I haven’t written on Judge Walker’s decision reversing Prop 8 in California.  Having been such a vocal opponent of Prop 8, and having written so personally about it here, it only seemed logical to my few remaining followers (since I now blog so infrequently!) that I would at least treat them to a celebratory entry.

I’ve been struggling with this, wanting to write, but having trouble putting words to my feelings.  Am I happy?  Of course.  I’m happy.  I keep telling myself that, and waiting for the elation to follow.  Yet somehow, I just feel deflated.  And so, I’ve struggled with what to say…. what to write here.

In a seemingly unrelated place today, I think I’ve found a bit of insight.

My earliest blog fans seemed to enjoy my essay on running and my use of music for inspiration.  I have actually avoided the subject of exercise in my blog for some time now as well –  because having finished the Couch to 5K program more than a year and a half ago, I basically fell off the exercise bandwagon completely.  This has been somewhat of a source of depression, because I want to be a person who exercises, but somehow, I continually make excuses instead of incorporating it into my life.

I became recently acquainted with a unique exercise regimen that I have decided to take on.  I suppose it can be customized to any person’s ability, but the idea for me is that I must run at least 1 mile a day for 100 days.  The concept being that by just making a small commitment to exercise in your day, every day, it will become habitual – you will learn the consistency of exercise, and perhaps even slowly increase your distance, though that’s not a requirement.  I decided almost immediately that this was the challenge for me….  100 days gets me 1/3 of the way through the year, exercising every day.  That will truly be a huge first for me.  And since right now I am capable of running a mile in about 11 minutes, it is a really small commitment of time….  There’s almost no way you can excuse yourself from 11 minutes of exercise a day…. especially when you have an elliptical sitting unused in your garage just waiting for you to try the “rainy day” excuse.  And I’m turning 35 this year, so this is going to be my present to myself….I am going to become consistent in caring for me.

As I’ve written before, the key for me with exercise is music….so I have already started reestablishing my running mix.  No Akon this time  — I’ve been enjoying a little Train, Vampire Weekend, Hellogoodbye, and Phoenix  (and I’m hiding the fact that there’s some Taylor Swift, Lady Gaga and Katy Perry in the mix too….I know, I’m practically a 15 year old girl with my music tastes, it is a bit embarrassing.)

Today, as I turned on my ipod while making dinner, and old favorite began to play….Tracy Chapman, Fast Car.  Is there anything much more hypnotizing than her voice?  I immediately thought of my running mix, and realized that there is just no way that Fast Car fits, no matter how much I love it…. it’s just too slow.

And here is where it comes, the connection – Judge Walker, Prop 8, 100 days, running and Tracy Chapman, (if I can make it for you….)

Sometimes, the slow path is what you have…. and because it’s what you have, it’s the best.  Which doesn’t mean that you can’t imagine a better way, it just means that you can’t have it.  I don’t really want to run 100 days in a row….I want to do a 10K tomorrow, I want to be a person who sticks with exercise easily.  But I’m not.  I have the 100 day plan, because that is what will bring success for me (I hope).

Judge Walker’s decision is what we have.  It’s the best that we could get.  But I can imagine something different.  I can imagine a world where Prop 8 never passed, where committed GLBT couples can have an expectation of acceptance….Where Judge Walker’s decision flipped a monumental switch and everything changed, and equality existed.  But it didn’t….it’s a long haul still.  The decision is on hold and the Supreme Court is probably going to weigh in.

And every day, people are falling in love, committing to each other, and having babies….and worrying about acceptance and whether or not the law will protect them.

I hear Tracy Chapman, and I want it to work….I want to fly away from this world to the one where this isn’t an issue for debate.  I want to do a 10K tomorrow, and I want Tracy to be part of the mix.  But instead, I have the 100 day challenge….the slow and steady path – 1 mile at a time.  And the truth is, Tracy doesn’t fit.  Eventually I’ll get to 100 miles and that will be quite a distance to have come.  And I know that eventually, equality will come too, and it will have come from much further than 100 miles.  And so Judge Walker’s decision is the best, because that is what we have…and I’m happy, really, I am.   And also, I’m sad.  Because I want a fast car….

October 10, 2008

10 Years and Crumbling

Filed under: California, Civil Rights, Family, gay marriage, Homosexuality, Law, Marriage, politics, Sexuality — saracallow @ 2:44 pm

My husband and I celebrated 10 years of marriage this week in Napa, California.  In between glasses of wine and amazing food, I found myself focusing on the institution of marriage, in California specifically, and I am sorry to say – the news is not all good.

California, post the legalization of gay marriage, is an example of disaster.  Since gay couples have been legally allowed to wed in California (an estimated 11,000 have taken advantage of the legalization), heterosexual marriage has suffered inestimable damage.

Yes, it’s true.  You can see it everywhere….  fewer people holding hands, more public fighting, children in tears in public…  the evidence of the destruction of traditional marriage is permeating all aspects of society.

When your gay neighbors wed, you go to bed at night – feeling the inferiority of your status as a heterosexual union – and many Californian’s are walking examples of insecurity about their marriage status.

What???

Okay, I exagerate, I’ll admit it.  But I don’t know what to say… despite all the dire warnings, I haven’t really noticed any difference.  I don’t feel differently about my marriage or my spouse.  I don’t look at the gay couples I see holding hands any differently than I did before.  The fear is ridiculous.  How is my commitment degraded by that of another dedicated couple?

And as we celebrate 10 years of marriage this week…  we raise our glasses to another 10…  and to the equality of our gay neighbors, that they may celebrate with us, their own union, in another decade. 

Equality for all.  No on Proposition 8.

September 18, 2008

Bachelor Parties with a Shot of Espresso

Filed under: Family, Marriage, parenting, Sexuality, women — saracallow @ 9:06 pm

Just imagine, it’s been one of THOSE mornings…  you know, the kind we’ve all had where one of your children spilled the milk all over the breakfast table, and the next one added the cereal to the floor.  The blouse you were going to wear for work didn’t get ironed, and the skirt has a stain on it.  Somehow, miraculously, you’ve managed to get everyone into the car with a few minutes to spare- and though you’re afraid that you may have left the curling iron on, at this point, you’re thinking, “I guess that’s what insurance is for.”  Then you see it…  the coffee stand up ahead – the little jolt of caffeine that will help you restart your day, and put your next foot forward – happier.  “Espresso Gone Wild” the sign says, and as you pull the car full of kids into the line, you think… “Exactly what I need, a seriously wild shot of espresso.” 

Unfortunately, as you pull up to the window (remember, WITH your children) you realize that there is also a view of some amazing pasties. No, not the pastry that could so well accompany your coffee, but pasties…  you know about these I’m sure, because in your busy life you have time and energy for fun sexual experimentation at home -  they are the cute little stickers that cover up the areola and nipple – and these particular ones are on a very robust bust.  As your mouth falls open, you hear a voice from the back of your car which belongs to your youngest, who is asking, “Mommy, why aren’t these people wearing any clothes?”

Welcome to Belfair, Washington, a small, unincorporated community whose population is estimated around 700.  Belfair has one main street through the commercial area of town, with few stoplights and more than their share of coffee stands.  Espresso Gone Wild opened in view of the main thoroughfare, and partially due to the effort of concerned citizens, has been forced to exchange the baristas’ pasties for the skimpiest of bathing suits.  But Espresso Gone Wild, Belfair is not the only coffee establishment bursting onto this bare new world, apparently many other chains will have baristas braving wintery weather in their birthday “attire.”

As my Belfair resident relative related the story of Espresso Gone Wild, I realized that there is a connection to something going on in my own life.  My husband is preparing to depart for the last bachelor party he will ever attend (yes, by the word “last” it is fair of you to intuit that it has been quite a negotiation).   Though I agreed to his attendance at this event, despite the fact that it’s out of the country, on my birthday, and a cultural practice l abhor –  (Yes, that is how important this particular bachelor’s long term friendship is to both of us), I remain quite disturbed by the entire engagement.  As I berate myself for even agreeing in the first place, I have to think, these two things are related.

See – I am one hundred percent behind the First Amendment, behind freedom of speech, your right to say what you wish, believe what you will, practice the religion of your choice and spend your money how you choose.  In fact, I would probably lean toward legalizing prostitution, drugs, and maybe even polygamy.  As long as Espresso Gone Wild is complying with the local codes, I believe they have as much right to do business in Belfair as the local citizens have to organize and oppose it.  And yet, I think we’re missing something in society, and while it surrounds us on a daily basis in many different forms, it is perhaps best exemplified by the cultural practice of the bachelor party.

The bachelor party.  Traditionally, the night before a couple joins their lives together, pledging to love, honor, and respect one another “until death do us part,” it is common practice to go out and do the exact opposite.  Rather than honor the woman with whom the groom will share the alter, he traditionally goes out with his buddies and participates in an evening that contributes to the objectification and devaluing of women.  Despite the generally held belief that the groom has been a faithful partner in the relationship leading up to this one night, for this night, there is a complete suspension of morality — and viewing, touching and treating women as simple sex objects is not only expected, but celebrated.  Most women accept this as tradition, and some even take part in a similarly styled evening themselves. 

Whenever I bring up my objection to the paradox of the two events and the inconsistent messages they together convey about the fledgling new marriage, I am widely regarded with rolling eyes.  “But it’s really just a chance for a guy to be with his buddies,” or  “There is just a basic biological difference in the sexuality of men,” or “You’re really making so much out of nothing,” or “It’s not about respect, it’s about fun.”

No, I’m sorry.  It’s not just a chance for men to hang out.  If it was just that, there’d be no need to include the strip joint.  There may be a basic difference in the way men and women view sex/physical attraction, but even if so, that doesn’t give men the right to objectify women… and what are men anyway?  Pure animal, no mind control at all – not even for their most beloved???  And you know what, I think there is something to be made out of all of this, and it is about respect.

Rooted in our society is some idea that it is okay to objectify women.  It is okay to participate in the bachelor party because there is really no harm done and it’s all in the name of fun.  But it’s not.  The women on stage in the strip club are our sisters, daughters, and mothers.  They all have a value beyond that of their physical appearance.  And the woman standing up at the alter, the day after the bachelor party has value too.  She is worthy of the respect of a man who will not objectify her, her mother, her sister, or her daughter.  In fact, one day, it may be his daughter up there at the alter.  Then how will it feel to picture the man she is pledging to partner her life with as having been out the night before, bare breasts hanging in his face and a g-string grinding in his lap?

And so we come to Espresso Gone Wild.  A legitimate business model, with apparently enough of a customer base to make it successful.  Legally, I’m on their side.  They have a right to do business and the women working there have a right to wear what they choose (within established law of course).  But I’ve got to tell you… I’m really rooting for the citizens who oppose them.  Not because it shouldn’t be legal… but because I hope they can convince enough people about the harm done to women through this sort of establishment that they make it commercially unviable.  Not in my town, not in view of my daughter, not at my wedding.  Let’s start calling it what it is, and demanding a little more respect.

September 10, 2008

Separate States: Religion and Politics

Filed under: California, Civil Rights, gay marriage, Homosexuality, Law, Marriage, politics, Sexuality — saracallow @ 3:33 pm

The entire gay marriage thing has really gotten me thinking about the intersection of religion and politics.  I can’t quite come up with a legitimate reason for discriminating against homosexuals in the institution of marriage that is not religiously based, and I have come to believe that all arguments, even those masquerading as secular are actually faith based.  Commonly made arguments that attempt to avoid religious bases in their “defense” of marriage include those surrounding tradition, procreation, and the government interest in protecting traditional families for economic reasons.  None of this really seems to make sense to me, and all seem a façade for what is actually a religiously based argument. 

Tradition?  The people of the United States have been changing tradition since the beginning of our nation.  It used to be “tradition” to consider people of races other than white as inferior…. But that was obviously not a reason to continue.  Most people would say that the traditional way of disciplining your children with a strong belt has long gone out of style – and for the better.  In the Wild West, there was something involving taking a number of agreed upon paces in the opposite direction of your opponent before turning to fire your gun (or at least that’s what Hollywood would have us believe).  Tradition hardly seems to hold much water in the face of progressive change. 

Procreation is the next common argument…  but the last I checked, there hasn’t been anyone out there suggesting that there should be some sort of fertility pre-screening in order to qualify for marriage.  In fact, I would think there would be great uproar at the idea that there should be a contractual agreement made at the time of application that the couple will provide the state with a child within a specified number of years, else the marriage be voided by lack of offspring.  Look out childless couples, the gay marriage issue may yet put your union in jeopardy.

On to economics.  It seems to me there is a great economic interest for the state in locking people into obligatory care relationships.  Fewer single parents, and a larger number of people with another potential provider in cases of injury / illness would clearly benefit the state economically….  And I can’t see how including same-gender couples in this arrangement wouldn’t be for the benefit of all taxpayers.  Many children are being adopted by gay individuals (hooray! – what a better place than our foster care system!) – and in the view of the state, those children clearly benefit by having two adults with some economic earning power to support them…  not to mention the benefits of having two adults to raise screaming toddlers or sex-crazed teenagers…  Hoping at least one head will remain clear in each distressing moment and upping the chances of raising a strong individual who will not need the state’s support in their own lives.

There are many faith based reasons for discrimination, though I doubt that’s the way many of the pious would like to have it said.  Religion by its nature is a discriminatory institution.  Many faiths have a dogma that should be adhered to if its followers are to participate fully in the benefits of the institution.  It really isn’t open to everyone – though if you’re willing to consider believing, most will do their best to convince you.  Nonetheless, only members of the Latter Day Saints crowd can attend a temple wedding.  Catholic.com lists five different requirements for receiving communion.  I don’t think anyone is arguing religions can’t discriminate.  If a religion decides that God has deemed to bless only heterosexual unions, well – that is their right, whether or not we disagree.  Maybe they even want to work on a new marketing campaign – don’t just be married, be joined by God.

The phrase, “separation of church and state” is attributed to Thomas Jefferson, in a letter he wrote to the Danbury Baptists.  In his letter, he explains that man “owes account to none other for his faith or his worship” and that “the legitimate powers of government reach actions only”.   Thomas Jefferson and the founding fathers owe some credit to John Locke, who believed that man alone could govern his own conscience which naturally exists in a state of liberty.  Upon this foundation was born our freedom of religion, and the separate states of government and personal religious belief.

Here is where some insert the…. “one nation under God” baloney – in the name of tradition no less.  Well, “One nation under God” is proof that tradition can change.  I have heard this phrase used by a radio personality (who probably was better informed but looking for rile up the audience for ratings) to justify the founding of the United States as an essentially Christian nation.  However, it was actually inserted into the pledge of allegiance in 1954 long after it was first written in 1892, and widely adopted by school children in the 1920s.  Incidentally, also during the 50′s “religious-revival” the words “In God We Trust” were added to paper money and replaced our un-official motto, “E Pluribus Unum,” or Out of Many, One.

Well, maybe then I’m wrong, and I’m actually casting a vote in favor of tradition – the tradition of our founding (not the Wild West).  Out of many voices, opinions, religious beliefs, family structures, and yes – that includes gay couples – One nation.  Freedom of your consciousness… judgment by your creator – not your fellow citizen.  Separate states – religion and politics.  Stop the masquerade.

April 18, 2008

The Birds and the Bees

Filed under: General Remarks, Peer Education, Sexuality — Tags: , , , — saracallow @ 11:52 am

The Birds and the Bees

The first time I was introduced to the “birds and the bees” was early in elementary school.  I’m not even sure if it was one specific event, or information gradually accumulated on the playground.  In any case, my peers were the first to educate me on how babies are made.  Luckily, they were generally accurate and I came away with a relatively clear understanding of the process – though I found it mind boggling that anyone would choose to participate in such a strange activity.

When my older cousin told me a sexually explicit joke, new information and understanding in hand, I then repeated it to my younger brother… with the admonition that if he EVER told our parents I would have to kill him.  Unfortunately for me, my brother was absent my new second grade sense of worldliness, and quickly repeated the joke to my parents.  Thus began my second course in sexual education – this one more awkward than the first, but filled with increasing information.

My parents gave us both the book, Where Did I Come From? by Peter Mayle.  With its anatomically correct cartoonish figures, and careful explanation, it left little to the imagination.  I think to this day, I would turn red if I saw it again.  Nonetheless, as a parent now, I recognize the value of such a book.  We read it together as a family, and any questions that my peers had left unanswered, were now covered – and apparently burned indelibly in my mind as I can still vividly recall the pictures today!  

My mother used a similar tactic as I entered my teen years, bringing me the book Our Bodies, Ourselves.  This time, my mom was a bit ahead of my peers, and many topics covered in the book were relatively new to me.  Upon giving me the book, my mom told me just to keep it in my room, and that it was up to me if I read it or not.  Of course, being the more sophisticated individual that she was, she must have known what would happen.  I carefully read the book cover to cover, absorbing all of its details, and came away with an education on sex and sexuality more detailed than I’m sure many women of 50 have had to this day!  Of course, I shared much of this information with my peers – and sometime after college graduation, my best friend from childhood thanked me for helping her through some of the important parts of growing up – with accurate information.  To this day, I am grateful for my mother’s foresight and sensitive introduction of important information into my life.

I think of these experiences as together being a metaphor for the blog.  My peers, my family, and written works have helped me develop my personal opinions and beliefs.  One is not a substitute for another, yet together they form a strong foundation on which to build.  Unfortunately, in women’s culture today, it seems to me that there is an increasing focus on the material or superficial, and a dwindling spotlight on issues of substance.  While I certainly enjoy the latest fashion magazine, and am always looking for a great recipe, I cannot bear to leave behind intellectual stimulation.  Broken Corset is my attempt to contribute to the intellectual stimulation of women.  Peers are invited to respond and contribute as well.  Tell us what you think… about anything.  Point us in the direction of interesting reading….  Explain a sophisticated theory that you understand well.  Stimulate the community to read, think, discuss, write, and read some more.  While I am sure that Broken Corset can not be quite as compelling as an early teen found Our Bodies, Ourselves – I hope it will interest you enough to return sometimes and see what’s here.    Even my mom plans to contribute!

Theme: WordPress Classic. Blog at WordPress.com. Fonts on this blog.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.